Source : George S. Yip, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, 1994
The first aspect to be pondered is why alliances, vs acquisitions, contracts or own developments.
Reasons for using strategic alliances :
Reducing costs
Reducing risk
Accelerating speed to market
Building flexibility
Monitoring competitors
Guiding the migration to knowledge
Neutralizing competition
(Source . Badaracco, 1991)
Role of coalitions – they can perform potentially any activity in the value chain :
(Source : Porter and Fuller, 1986)
Benefits and costs of coalitions:
Strategic benefits |
Strategic costs |
Economies of scale or learning |
Coordination |
Access to knowledge or ability to perform an activity |
Erosion of competitive position |
Reducing risk |
Creation of adverse bargaining position |
Shaping competition |
|
(Source : Porter and Fuller, 1986)
Globalization encourages joint ventures when it drives firms to expand their capabilities and access to markets.
Globalization discourages joint ventures when it drives firms to integrate their worldwide operations.
A clear differentiation must be established between product links (= way of obtaining products), and knowledge links (= way of obtaining new skills and capabilities).
Options in degree of vertical integration :
Generic motives for strategic alliances :
(Source : Lorange and Roos, 1992)
Criteria for selecting long term coalition partners :
Has desired source of competitive competence
Needs a complementary or balanced contribution
Has compatible view of international strategy
Poses low risk of becoming a competitor
Has preemptive value as a partner
Has organizational capability
(Source: Porter and Fuller, 1996)
Success factors in strategic alliances:
More successful where partners are horizontally related to their ventures rather than vertically or unrelated
Last longer between partners of similar cultures, asset sizes and venturing experience levels
Industry traits are more important than partner´s traits :
Worry less about partner
Worry more about competitive needs to be addressed
Principles for joint venturing success
Don´t judge success by longevity
Collaboration is competition in a different form
Harmony is not the most important measure of success
Cooperation has limits – must defend against competitive compromise
Learning from partners is paramount
Key findings in strategic alliances :
Many companies often enter alliances to avoid investments
Troubled laggards often strike alliances with surging latecomers – dependency spiral
Alliances run most smoothly when one partner is intent on learning and the other is intent on avoidance
Conditions for mutual gain :
Partners´ strategic goals converge while their competitive goals diverge
Size and power of both partners is modest compared with industry leaders
Each partner believes it can learn from the other and at the same time limit access to proprietary skills
Dangers in strategic alliances :
Potential for transfer is greatest when the partner´s contribution is easily transported, easily interpreted and easily absorbed.
Ways to limit transparency :
Limit scope of formal agreements
Establish formal performance standards
Set up a gatekeeper
Beware of too much collegiality
Interface mode :
Single point |
Multipoint |
Regulates access |
Helps build support |
Limits transparency |
Broader “window” |
Key gatekeepers |
Direct connections |
Tradeoffs not visible to partners |
Allows to discover potential value |
Apparent consistency of position |
Closer joint perceptions, lesser risk of disconnect |
(Source . Yves Doz)
Managing alliances:
Have a clear understanding of company´s current capabilities and the capabilities it will need in the future
Consider a wide range of possible alliances
Before committing company to an alliance, scrutinize the values, commitment and capabilities of prospective partners
Understand the risks of opportunism, knowledge leaks and obsolescence
Avoid undue dependence on alliances
Structure and manage alliances as separate companies
Partners must come to trust each other
Change core operations and traditional organizations so that they will be open to learning from alliances
Alliances must be led, not managed
(Source : Badaracco, 1991)